2021 Portuguese Grand Prix
- Mercedes’ Pace
- Midfield Stalemate
- Wrong and right strategies
- Bottas, oh Bottas
- Mazepin vs Schumi vs Latifi
- An idea for F1
Mercedes’ Pace
If it wasn’t apparent already, this race might have just shown how well oiled the Mercedes F1 team is. It all starts with the car. It’s fundamentally better than the Red Bull this season. It’s definitely more powerful, seems more driveable and switched on in race trim compared to the Red Bull. In terms of raw pace, the Bull may be just a smidge ahead, however it’s the whole package that counts. Pair the Mercedes with the capable hands of Lewis Hamilton and you’ve got a winning formula which has proven near-impossible to beat in the hybrid era so far.
The closest challenge so far was Ferrari in 2017-18, but even then it was clear after the offset of each season that Mercedes was not going to be beaten that easily, massively outdeveloping and outsmarting their prancing rivals in both seasons.
All of this leaves Vettel as the only non-Mercedes driver to have led the F1 WDC in the hybrid era. This fact still astonishes me.
Midfield Stalemate
The biggest surprise in Portugal was Alpine, putting in a strong performance in the race to finish in P7 and P8, picking up valuable constructors points after Raikkonen went out of the race with a broken front wing after contact with his teammate at the beginning of lap 2 and Alpha Tauri, Aston Martin, Giovinazzi and Russell all failing to put up any meaningful challenge further ahead. Tsunoda in particular had a complete off-day and Stroll didn’t seem to be as sharp as usual either.
However, the pecking order was otherwise generally quite clear, the McLaren in the hands on Norris very capable of leading the midfield pack comfortably with Leclerc in the #1 Ferrari not far behind. Alpha Tauri continue to be 50% unimpressive and 50% bad, Aston Martin quite disappointing and Russell clearly slower than the rest in a slower car in ordinary conditions.
Wrong and right strategies
Stroll getting past Vettel on lap 60 and both Alpines getting past Sainz relatively easily really drew a clear line between the wrong and right strategies for the race. Both Sainz and Vettel started on the softs and put on fresh mediums with 2/3 of the race yet to go. It does sometimes make me question how wrong strategists who do nothing but analyse relevant data all day can get their decisions. No matter how low the degredation is, no rational thinker would think that’s a good idea. Is an engineering degree really necessary for a job that requires nothing but logic?
Bottas, oh Bottas
The curious case of Valtteri Bottas. He’s sometimes spectacular, mostly not. It’s clear he lacks the raw talent of his teammate or the absolute dedication and bite of his predecessor, but really it’s just becoming too clear that he’s not bringing much to the dominant team of the hybrid era. He hasn’t been able to shine in any of the seasons he has been at the team.
If I had to make the decision, I would go for a less amicable solution for the team and put another driver in the car for 2022. For me, however, that driver wouldn’t be George Russell. In the current roster, I would aim to poach Verstappen from Red Bull or pull Vettel up to the big sister seat. Verstappen vs. Hamilton would just be spectacular to watch, but seeing as Verstappen is bound to Red Bull with a long-term contract, Vettel would, in my opinion, be the next best decision for the team. Not only does he have the best relationship with Hamilton, but in a top car which is developed properly throughout a season, he can really shine. Also with his age, Mercedes, like with Hamilton, wouldn’t need to give him a very long contract. This would give them even more time to find the right drivers to put in their seats.
This may be a controversial opinion, but I stand by it as the solution which makes the most sense with the current situation in F1. GR isn’t going anywhere, and I still have the feeling that most other talents are unproven to pick anyone else for the top seat.
Mazepin vs Schumi vs Latifi
It’s no secret that Mazepin isn’t really that good, especially compared to his teammate. But it seems nobody has put any thought into the reasons why.
While Schumacher was putting huge pressure on Latifi, forcing him to crack in the faster Williams ahead, Mazepin was holding up race leader Perez and getting scolded for it whilst being a full minute behind his own teammate. What makes Schumacher so much better?
Apart from having arguably the best F1 driver in history as a dad and a racing family behind him, he has the full support of the Ferrari Academy. Being one of their drivers, he naturally has full access to their simulator and older F1 cars, which he makes full use of, having tested the 2018 Ferrari recently and spending a lot of time developing his skills on the sim.
These are resources which are crucial to a developing driver, resources that can make a massive difference on development trajectories and at the end of the day they are increasing the gap between the 2 Haas rookies on track. Money of course can buy a seat in F1, but it can’t buy talent or the support of a powerhouse like Ferrari. While Mazepin did get to test with Mercedes, apparently having gone through a lot of laps and scenarios with the best run team in F1, he seemingly hasn’t been able to put any of that knowledge to practice.
Another case of disappointment is Latifi. Just the fact that he got done by Schumacher in the Haas towards the end of the race, and is regularly in Russels’ back pocket should be evidence enough that he’s also not quite right for F1. To top it off, Latifi is already 25, going on for 26 in June. He’s no young talent any more. He has had over a year in F1 to develop, yet I’ve seen nothing.
An idea for F1
Getting a seat in F1 is already near-impossible. Having 2 occupied by, frankly, average sunday drivers when there are plenty of other great talents looking to get in makes it a bigger issue rooted deep in the whole concept of the sport. While karting is starting to become more accessible to more people, seats at the pinnacle will always be hard to reach. It’s a topic that has been discussed many times, it’s the way Formula 1 has always been.
An idea to help mitigate the issue would be to have a “baseline” team run directly by the FIA, and have the team field 2 or 4 cars. This team occupies different drivers every season, so no retaining any drivers beyond the first season. If the F2 champion doesn’t get a drive in F1, he would automatically join the “FIA Team”. If he does get a drive, the “FIA Team” should consider every performance metric available to determine the next best talent to fill the seats. This way, champions and talents alike get to showcase their skills to the world, making them even more attractive to other teams or other top motorsport categories. The fact that drivers aren’t retained would also allow a greater number of talented drivers to get an opportunity to drive in F1 and fulfil dreams to those who deserve it.
Best, worst, luckiest & unluckiest
Best – Hamilton: Easy to say but he didn’t put a foot wrong and was able to get past his rivals very effectively and do what Bottas couldn’t.
Worst – Tsunoda: Apart from Mazepin, Tsunoda was the obvious choice. The rookie pretty much disappeared off the face of the earth in a mistake-ridden performance. Bottas’ defence and inability to set a FL on fresh softs compared to RB on used softs gets an honorable mention.
Luckiest – Nobody: But for the fun of it, Mazepin for getting to the end of the race without spinning, because that’s what everyone wants to hear.
Unluckiest – Raikkonen: Unfortunate incident which forced him to retire early in lap 2.